bnt attorneys for CEE close.straight.forward

Guiding your
business in CEE.

Vietējo biroju priekšrocības Jūsu biznesam

Centrāl- un Austrumeiropas reģionu pārzinām kā neviens cits

Profesionāla juridiskā palīdzība mērķu sasniegšanai

Mūsu speciālisti risina sarežģītas lietas izmantojot efektīvus risinājumus.

Kopīgs ceļš uz ideālo mērķi

Komerciāli domājoši partneri Jums personīgi palīdzēs nostāties uz panākumu ceļa.

The Supreme Court of the Czech Republic has ruled that a person occupying a non-rental property without an agreement with the owner is not obliged to make payments to the owner on the legal ground of unjust enrichment.

According to a general civil-law principle, nobody must enrich themselves groundlessly at the expense of someone else. The concept of unjust enrichment also covers the pecuniary advantage derived by someone who unlawfully uses third-party property – i.e., who uses such property in the absence of a valid contract or other legal title. Whoever enriches themselves in this manner at the expense of the owner must surrender the advantage to the owner. However, no rule is without exception – and the Supreme Court has derived such an exception for the case of unlawful use of a piece of real property owned by a third party.

The amount of the compensatory payment to be made to the owner for the use of their asset without any legal basis is based on the advantage gained by the unlawful user. In the case of real estate, established case law says the ill-gotten advantage can be expressed in money by taking one's cue from the amount of the customary rent in the market at the given place and time for a comparable property, which a tenant would under normal circumstances be compelled to pay. In this sense, the compensation to be paid is being derived from the level of market rent, though attention must always be given to the specific circumstances and conditions of the actual piece of real estate.

In actual practice, it is not always possible to determine what amount of rent is market standard, e.g. because "comparable properties" are in fact not fit to be let and thus not marketable. This concerns in particular neglected properties in a poor structural condition.

In such cases, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that those who used such third-party property without any legal title did not gain any pecuniary advantage to the detriment of the owner, and that they therefore did not have to pay any monetary compensation to the owner.

Clearly, this solution is relevant only in highly specific cases. Even so, one may question the Supreme Court's wisdom, as it is doubtful whether this solution is equitable and fair.

Source:
Judgment 28 Cdo 4184/2018 by the Czech Supreme Court of 27 February 2019

 

 

  • bnt Biroji
  • Sadarbības partneri
BIROJI

Ciešā saiknē ar pasauli un stipri reģionā.

Ar saviem desmit birojiem un starptautisku speciālistu komandām jau gadiem atrodamies pašā Eiropas centrā. Visus mūsu birojus reģiona metropolēs partneri vada decentralizēti, katrs birojs cieši sadarbojas cits ar citu profesionālā jomā.

Vairāk
  • Minska
  • Sofija
  • Prāga
  • Tallina
  • Nirnberga
  • Budapešta
  • Rīga
  • Viļņa
  • Varšava
  • Bratislava
  • Bucharest
  • Timisoara

Katrā valstī atšķirīga ir ne tikai tiesību sistēma, bet arī mentalitāte. Tieši tāpēc mums ir izveidoti vietējie biroji.

Zuzana Chudáčková
Partnere / Slovākija

Mūsu klienti vēlas virzīties uz priekšu. Tāpēc mēs nerunājam aplinkus, bet sniedzam skaidrus ieteikumus.

Tomáš Běhounek
Partneris / Čehija

Man šķiet aizraujoši būt tieši iesaistītam sava klienta darījumos. Tā es varu izvairīties no apkārtceļiem.

Martin Neupert
Partneris / Vācija, Polija un Bulgārija

Komunicējot svešvalodā, svarīgas ir nianses. Sarunājoties dzimtajā valodā, mēs ieklausāmies dziļāk.

Rainer Tom
Partneris / Ungārija